There are a variety of alternatives for dental restorations of decayed, fractured or lost teeth. The greater the availability of alternative dentistry, the more important it is to know the characteristics of each material and technique used, including its advantages and limitations. In addition to technical and material restoration, one must discern the boundary between direct indications and indirect dental restoration. Your local Cosmetic Dentistry Chestnut Hill can help with this.
Direct and indirect dental restorations
Which one is better? This is the question that patients ask more frequently as the days pass. This decision will depend on several factors including:
* Extension of cavities, fracture or existing restoration needed to be replaced.
* Mechanical strength of the remnant.
* Location and accessibility to the tooth.
* Location margin with respect to the gum.
* Specific features of the dentition and periodontal health of the patient.
* Economic cost of the procedure for the patient.
* Assess risks and benefits of procedures for the patient.
* Ability to assess professional procedures.
* Professional preference, which means choosing one technique over another.
* Acceptance by the patient of the proposed treatment.
It is important to be clear that there is no single solution for all clinical situations and the individualization of treatment is crucial to the success and durability of the process dental treatment. The key of Cosmetic Dentistry in Middleburg VA is to create a custom treatment for each patient, seeking to restore the fewest number of teeth in the shortest time possible. The restoration project must also be conservative, preserving most of the dental structure. With this, there is less risk of failures and Gainesville Dental Associates can achieve a greater mechanical strength of the teeth. In addition, a conservative project allows restoration alternatives in the future if necessary.
The available options for dental reconstruction are the composite resin, ceramic and glass ionomer cement. The glass ionomer is suitable for direct restorations, composite resins for direct and indirect restorations and ceramics for indirect restorations. The use of glass ionomer is restricted to small and distant areas away from direct occlusal stress injuries. Composite resins are the most versatile materials. The possibility of joining the enamel and dentin structures are done so in a more conservative way, the concept of preparation is limited to the removal of tissue affected by decay or trauma. Click here for more information.
